WHY ELECTROHYPERSENSITIVITY (EHS) IS A BIOLOGICALLY EXPECTED REACTION TO HARMFUL RADIATION – NEW PAPER

New paper by Peter Hensinger and Bernd I. Budzinski published in the journal umwelt-medizin-gesellschaft in February 2024 – “Why electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is a biologically expected reaction to harmful radiation”

Hensinger_Electrohypersensibility_ Download pdf

Details on Press Release and Paper from Diagnose-Funk.org


Related article from EHTrust

A new paper by Peter Hensinger and Bernd I. Budzinski published in the journal umwelt-medizin-gesellschaft entitled “Why electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is a biologically expected reaction to harmful radiation” concludes that:

There is a science-based explanation as to why people become electrohypersensitive: The non-ionising radiation from wireless communication leads to oxidative cell stress, this is undisputed in science. Oxidative cell stress leads to inflammatory processes in the organism.

The claim that electrohypersensitivity cannot exist because the limit values protect against the harmful effects of electromagnetic fields is used to market digital products. The ICNIRP limits are scientifically untenable. The argument of a lack of causality is being instrumentalized to undermine the precautionary principle and thus a protection policy.

The effects of non-ionising radiation on the metabolism in the organism have been proven by over a thousand studies. These effects, triggered by EMF, are felt by people with electrohypersensitivity.

The arguments used to cast doubt on electrohypersensitivity are not based on medical-biological facts, but on business interests and expert opinions of convenience. It is damaging to the industry’s business if its products are associated with the consequences of illness. It created the “mental disorder” narrative, a marketing story to protect its products. The authorities continue to spread it and ignore the medical causes.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.