Founder of the Coeurs d’EHS association (EHS Hearts)
Hello,
I’d like to inform you that, as every year,World EHS Day, subtitled “World Day of Intolerance to Electromagnetic Pollution”, will take place on June 16.
This Day, which I created on June 16, 2018, was taken up in a few European countries from its first edition and very quickly became global. A dedicated Facebook group promotes it internationally and, this year, almost 2,000 organizations and people concerned by EHS will be informed by email about the event.
Please forward this email to your contacts interested in this cause. If we ALL get involved, we’ll make this a great day!
On 27th February 2025, the Irish Times published an article titled ‘Is there a connection between mobile phones and cancer? Irish Times 27/2/25
In response to the article, Professor Tom Butler, UCC, wrote a letter to the Editor a few days later – which was been published today 20th May 2025.
The publication of the letter followed a formal complaint by Prof Butler to The Press Ombudsman that the original Irish Times article may have breached Principle 1 of the Press Council of Ireland’s Code of Practice viz. “Principle 1 − Truth and Accuracy 1.1 In reporting news and information, the press shall strive at all times for truth and accuracy.”
February 2020 – The Press Ombudsman upheld a complaint by Professor Tom Butler that The Irish Times breached Principle 1 (Truth and Accuracy) of the Code of Practice of the Press Council of Ireland. Irish Times and Tom Butler
September 2023 – Professor Tom Butler, Letter to the Irish Examiner ‘Phone Radiation’
The 5th of May 2025 saw the passing of yet another great Trojan in the campaign for safe technology – John Weigel – who died after a short illness.
John was a writer and researcher. He spent many years campaigning and sharing information and knowledge from around the world spelling out the clear scientific evidence of adverse health effects from radiofrequency microwave and EMF radiation from our technological infrastructure and smart devices, as well as the dangers of the potential corporate and political misuse of the technology.
He set up the Alliance for Irish Radiation Protection and gave talks around the country about the adverse health effects from masts, wifi, mobile phones, etc
In addition to health risks, he warned of the real threat to our privacy, security and democracy should we ‘take our eye off the ball’.
John was described by those who met him as a highly intelligent man who was warm, kind, committed, easy to approach and talk to, and challenging.
A sufferer himself, John’s support and encouragement to many others with Electromagnetic Radiation Syndrome will be especially missed, along with his sense of fun.
Scientific Experts Urge the FCC to Establish Science-Based Exposure Limits to Address Wireless Health Risks
Media Contact: communications@icbe-emf.org
Press Release April 27, 2025
Environment International has published a new systematic review, partially funded by the World Health Organization, concluding that there is high certainty of the evidence linking cell phone radiofrequency (RF) radiation to two types of cancer in animals. In response, leading scientists from the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) are calling for immediate policy action to protect public health and the environment, warning that further delay could have serious consequences amid the global surge in the use of wireless communication devices.
What the Review Found
A new systematic review of 52 animal studies, “Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Cancer in Laboratory Animal Studies” by Mevissen et al. (2025), concluded there is high certainty of the evidence linking RF radiation exposure to two types of tumors: gliomas in the brain and malignant schwannomas in the heart. Notably, the same types of tumors have also been observed in human studies, adding significant confidence that the associations observed in human studies are real.
The review also found moderate certainty of evidence of an increased risk of rare tumors, such as pheochromocytomas in the adrenal glands and hepatoblastomas in the liver. Additionally, some studies indicated a possible association with lymphomas, although the findings were inconsistent.
ICBE-EMF highlights that in 2011, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radiofrequency radiation (RF-EMF) as a Group 2B “possible” human carcinogen, noting limited animal evidence. Since then, major animal studies — including those by the U.S. National Toxicology Program and the Ramazzini Institute — have found that RF radiation exposure causes cancer in rats.
The new WHO-funded review, concluding there is “high certainty” animal evidence of cancer causation, reinforces calls for IARC to urgently reevaluate the cancer classification of RF radiation.
Given this high level of certainty, government policymakers worldwide should immediately move to revise their RF radiation exposure limits to protect public health and the environment.
Statements by Experts of the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields
“The evidence is now clear —cell phone radiation can cause cancer in animals in concordance with the tumor types identified in human studies of mobile phone users. As animal studies are essential for predicting cancer risk in humans, governments should develop science-based safety standards to protect human health. The conclusion of the study commissioned by the WHO shows that the long-standing assumption current government limits are based on — that cell phone RF radiation can only cause harm through tissue heating — is wrong” stated Ron Melnick, PhD, Chair of the ICBE-EMF and former senior toxicologist and Director of Special Programs at the National Toxicology Program and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS).
“The preponderance of the research published since 1996 finds adverse biologic and health effects from long-term exposure to low levels of modulated or pulsed wireless RF radiation. Given the widespread global usage of wireless among users of all ages, even a very small increase in the incidence of disease will have broad implications for public health,” stated said Joel Moskowitz, PhD, Director of the Center for Family and Community Health at the School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, also an ICBE-EMF member.
“To protect public health and the environment, exposure to cell phone and wireless radiation must be significantly reduced,” said Elizabeth Kelley, Managing Director of ICBE-EMF. She referenced the EMF Scientist Appeal now signed by 267 scientists from 45 nations. “Hundreds of scientists worldwide agree that current exposure limits are outdated and do not adequately protect against health risks.”
ICBE-EMF emphasizes that governments must act immediately to strengthen regulatory limits on wireless radiation to protect public health. Wildlife exposures must be mitigated. Current exposure standards, based on outdated assumptions, do not reflect the scientific evidence linking RF radiation to cancer and other health effects.
ICBE-EMF also highlights practical steps the public can take to reduce exposure — such as using speakerphone or wired headsets, keeping devices away from the body, and limiting wireless use among children — but stresses that personal actions are not a substitute for government-enforced safety standards. Stronger, science-based regulations are urgently needed to address the widespread and increasing exposure to wireless radiation.
About the ICBE-EMF
ICBE-EMF is an international consortium of scientists, doctors and researchers with expertise and peer-reviewed publications on the biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields including wireless RF radiation. Wireless devices such as cell phones, cordless phones, Wi-Fi and cell towers emit radiofrequency (RF) radiation.
ICBE-EMF recently published major scientific papers concluding that current government safety limits for wireless radiation are not protective of public health and highlighting engineering solutions that could dramatically reduce radiation emissions from cell phones.
The Commission is committed to upholding the highest standards of scientific research and makes science-based recommendations to ensure the protection of the public and environment. icbe-emf.org
Posted inUncategorized|Comments Off on PRESS RELEASE: NEW WHO-FUNDED STUDY REPORTS HIGH CERTAINTY OF THE EVIDENCE LINKING CELL PHONE RADIATION TO CANCER IN ANIMALS
A new study published in the Fortune Journal of Health Sciences by Dr. Lennart Hardell and researcher Michael Carlberg reported an association between prostate cancer and exposure to the radiofrequency (RF) radiation emitted by cell phones.
Exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation in the frequency range 30 kHz–300 GHz was in 2011 evaluated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) at the World Health Organization (WHO) to be a ‘possible’ human carcinogen, Group 2B. This was based on epidemiological results on increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. Results on other cancer types are sparse. An increased incidence in male rats of proliferative lesions in the prostate gland induced by RF radiation was found in the US NTP study. Thus, it was pertinent to study an association with prostate cancer in human studies. We analyzed data in two of our previous studies, one on brain tumors (only deceased subjects; those who died from prostate cancer were defined as cases) and another on prostate cancer (living subjects) that included similar questions on use of mobile phones or cordless phones. The pooled analysis gave for mobile phone use OR = 1.8, 95 % CI = 1.01-3.1, increasing in the >10 year latency group to OR = 2.8, 95 % CI = 1.5-5.3. Also, use of the cordless phone gave increased risk, although not statistically significant. Dose-response analysis gave highest risk for >2,000 h use of the mobile phone with OR = 2.4, 95 % CI = 1.2-5.1. The cordless phone yielded highest risk in the group 1001-2000 h with OR = 2.3, 95 % CI = 1.01-5.4. Lower OR was seen for use > 2,000 h but based on low numbers. Higher risk was seen in cases with more aggressive cancer based on Gleason score, PSA, and high risk profile, and among subjects with heredity for prostate cancer.
US The National Institutes of Health (NIH) refuses to reveal nearly 2,500 pages of records related to the National Toxicology Program’s (NTP) decision to shut down its research on how wireless radiation affects human health, according to an investigation by The Defender.
You’re invited to join Environmental Health Trust’s founder, Devra Davis, when she presents at the webinar Navigating Environmental Crossroads: Bee Pollinators, Pesticides, and the Wireless Revolution sponsored by Environment magazine publishers Taylor & Francis on March 26 at 5.00pm Ireland. The event, hosted on Zoom, is presented by University of California, Irvine.
During the webinar, Dr. Davis and other leading experts will explore the critically interconnected issues of pollinators, pesticides, and wireless technology, including the implications for policymaking and potential paths forward. The webinar offers an opportunity to engage in discussions on technology, ecology, the environment, and public health. The pioneering work of EHT President Kent Chamberlin and Vice President for Scientific Research and Clinical Studies Rob Brown will also be featured.
Please register for the March 26 webinar using the link below.
Navigating Environmental Crossroads: Bee Pollinators, Pesticides, and the Wireless Revolution
Date & Time
Mar 26, 2025 05:00 PM in Dublin
Description
Join us for an enlightening webinar exploring two critical environmental issues of our time. Leading experts will explore these interconnected issues, their implications for policy-making, and potential paths forward. Don’t miss this opportunity to engage with cutting-edge discussions on technology, ecology, environment, and public health. 1. Neonicotinoid Pesticides and Bees: Examining the impact of these widely-used pesticides on crucial pollinator populations and the implications for global food security. We’ll unravel the complex relationship between agricultural practices and pollinator health. We’ll examine the latest research on neonicotinoids’ impact on bee populations and discuss the policy implications for sustainable agriculture. 2. Wireless Technology: Navigating Policy Dilemmas and Systemic Risks in our increasingly connected world. We’ll explore the challenges policymakers face in balancing technological progress with potential long-term risks, including emerging concerns around widespread wireless adoption, potential human health effects and biodiversity impacts, and strategies for navigating the complex landscape of technological progress and precaution. Our distinguished speakers will delve into the latest research, policy challenges, and potential solutions surrounding these pressing environmental concerns. This webinar offers a unique opportunity to engage with leading experts as we explore the delicate balance between technological progress, environmental preservation, sustainability practices and public health. Moderator: Oladele A. Ogunseitan: Distinguished Professor, Department of Population Health & Disease Prevention, Department of Environmental & Occupational Health, Joe C. Wen School of Population & Public Health, University of California, Irvine.
Posted inUncategorized|Comments Off on Navigating Environmental Crossroads: Bee Pollinators, Pesticides, and the Wireless Revolution – Webinar 26th March
Phonegate Alert notes with the utmost attention the publication on March 3, 2025 of a study by Santé Publique France (SPF) on the incidence of cancers in adolescents and young adults (AYA) aged 15 to 39. This report reveals a worrying increase in glioblastoma (serious brain cancer) in this age group, with a significant rise of +6.11% per year over the period studied (2000-2020). This represents an overall increase of around 233% over 20 years!
Glioblastoma: Red alert among young people
This increase is particularly alarming, as it contrasts with trends observed for other types of cancer. While the overall incidence of cancers in the AYA population has seen an increase followed by stabilization (or even a slight decrease), the continuing rise in glioblastomas stands out. With regard to central nervous system (CNS) tumours in general, the study also highlights the need to interpret the data with caution due to various potential biases, but the specific increase in glioblastomas remains a major cause for concern.
The trend is accelerating: alarming!
In a report published in 2018, Santé Publique France noted a 4-fold increase in the number of glioblastomas in 30 years (i.e. a 300% increase over the period 1990-2018). Although a direct comparison is tricky, a cautious extrapolation of the increase in the AYA population over 30 years suggests that the trend may have accelerated further.
As SPF explains in this new report:
“…the increase in glioblastomas (+ 6.11% per year in this study) has already been observed in the report on the evolution of incidence between 1990 and 2018 [25] in which the incidence of histologically confirmed glioblastomas increased by + 3.6% per year in men and + 3.3% per year in women (all ages combined).”
Phonegate Alert once again sounds the alarm
This new study confirms the warnings that our NGO is constantly sounding concerning the potential risks associated with exposure to electromagnetic waves, particularly those emitted by cell phones.
“This study highlights the correlation in time between the massive use of smartphones by young people and the corresponding increase in glioblastomas. It also validates the alerts issued during the Phonegate scandal, which revealed overexposure to cell phone radiation during this period and even today,” says Dr. Marc Arazi, President of Phonegate Alert. He points to the responsibility of the public authorities and, above all, that of the cell phone industry.”
Glioblastoma: exposure to radio frequencies identified as a risk factor
The new SPF report again highlights, among known or suspected risk factors:
“ethnic origin, gender, family history of gliomas, genetic diseases, radiation or environmental exposures (particularly pesticides and electromagnetic fields), and medical imaging examinations delivering ionizing radiation [26-29].”
It’s time to act: our demands
Phonegate Alert insists on the need not to ignore this alarm signal and urges the health authorities to:
Strengthen independent research into the potential links between exposure to electromagnetic radiation and the development of glioblastoma in young adults and in the general population.
Better inform the public, and young people in particular, about the potential health risks (infertility, brain and central nervous system tumors) associated with the excessive and careless use of cell phones and other wave-emitting devices.
Immediately apply the precautionary principle to exposure to electromagnetic radiation, in particular by limiting exposure of children and adolescents.
An Bord Pleanála has insisted it does not formulate policy around planning decisions, despite a board member telling an investigation into its decisions a “change in policy emphasis” had encouraged the erection of telecommunications masts.
A recently-ended two-year investigation by senior counsel Lorna Lynch into planning matters at the agency concluded an undesirable “statistical anomaly” existed in terms of An Bord Pleanála inspectors’ recommendations to refuse permission for such masts being overturned by two specific board members.
Ms Lynch further concluded there were insufficient grounds to refer that matter to the minister for housing to decide whether or not those decisions constituted “stated misbehaviour”.
While the planning board has declined to publish Ms Lynch’s report on foot of legal advice, a summary of the report’s findings, recently released by board chair Peter Mullan, noted in coming to her conclusions regarding those mast decisions, Ms Lynch had “relied upon the evidence of one board member that there was a change in policy emphasis to a view that it was important to have mobile phone mast infrastructure, where possible”.
Planning policy in legal terms is ordinarily dictated by the minister for housing on foot of the Planning Act, with more general policy stemming from the National Planning Framework and, at a more granular level, the county development plans.
An Bord Pleanála was previously understood to be required to have regard to those policies in making its decisions, as opposed to dictating “policy emphasis” itself.
Planning lawyer with FP Logue Solicitors Eoin Brady, who has overseen a number of legal challenges of An Bord Pleanála’s previous mast decisions, said such a change in policy emphasis should be published so the public knows what criteria are being used to make planning decisions.
“They’re saying a change in policy emphasis. Well, is that change documented? We would want to see it, to be able to scrutinise it. How else are we to advise clients as to whether or not any decision has been properly arrived at if there is an unwritten policy?” Mr Brady said.
“We now know that there was a change in policy emphasis and the public are entitled to know what that change was, what the baseline was before, when the change happened, and crucially what is the policy now,” he said.
In response to a query from the Irish Examiner regarding Ms Lynch’s statement there had been a change in policy emphasis, a Bord Pleanála spokesperson said it “is not appropriate” for Mr Mullan to comment on Ms Lynch’s conclusions.
“The board itself does not formulate policy,” the spokesperson said.
Separate questions as to where or when the change in policy emphasis originated from, if it had been documented in writing or officially published, and as to what the policy is now, were not responded to.
The Irish Examiner first reported in May 2022 that former deputy chair of ABP Paul Hyde had voted to overrule his own planning inspectors in the majority of applications for telecommunications masts over the previous two years.
Mr Hyde later separately pleaded guilty to two offences in terms of non-declaration of assets and received a criminal conviction, though a custodial sentence was overturned on appeal.
Posted inUncategorized|Comments Off on Review of ESRI Survey & Report August 2024: ‘Public Perceptions of Electromagnetic Fields and Environmental Health Risks’
Electromagnetic Sense Ireland 