Two articles have appeared in the Farmers Weekly publication in the UK this week warning landowners with mobile phone masts on their land to be aware of the risks concerning radiation and the increased risks with the expansion of 5G.
26th January 2020 – Landowners warned to be aware of phone mast radiation risk
https://www.fwi.co.uk/business/compliance/landowners-warned-to-be-aware-of-phone-mast-radiation-risk
28th January 2020 – How to manage radiation exclusion zones for phone masts
SOURCE ARTICLE: EMFANALYSIS.com
Author – Jeromy Johnson September 2019
I have received dozens of emails from people in several countries who report an increase in, or initial onset of, electrical sensitivity symptoms when high-speed fiber optic internet is installed in their neighborhood. How could this be? Isn’t wired fiber optic internet, which uses light to transmit large amounts of data at incredibly high speeds, supposed to be safer and healthier for everyone?
The issue is that fiber optic internet service does not only use light to transmit data. The high-speed fiber optic data must be converted to electrical signals before the data can be transmitted to the home on the existing copper cable or phone line DSL. Those electrical signals, which carry our internet data, are not inherently problematic because they are in a very narrow frequency range and don’t typically radiate from the cable or phone lines.
However, there can be a significant problem with the high-speed fiber optic converters out at the street (or in the home with some newer fiber systems) that create these electrical data signals. This is because the converters are not designed with low-EMI emissions in mind. Thus, their power supplies and operation can generate high amounts of wide-spectrum EMI (electromagnetic interference). This inadvertent EMI then piggybacks on the copper cable and phone lines into our homes where it can radiate from every copper wire. This EMI from the fiber optic infrastructure is a primary reason why electrical sensitivity is increasing when high-speed internet is installed in our communities.
READ FULL ARTICLE HERE
More information on why we need to be cautious about promoting fibre-optic cabling as a safe alternative to wireless and 5G :
Fiber Broadband and Small Cells: An Unholy Municipal Alliance
Arthur Firstenberg – 5G, Birds, Bees, & Humanity …. “If you advocate for high speed fibre, you are advocating for 5G”
SOURCE ARTICLE :PHONEGATE ALERT, FRANCE
The Court of Appeal of Turin confirms in a full judgment published on 13 January 2020 (904/2019 of 3.12.2019 , Romeo v. INAIL) the decision of the Tribunal of Ivrea of 2017. Judge Fadda considers that the worker’s acoustic neuroma (benign tumour of the head) was indeed caused by the use of the mobile phone.
According to the Court:
“there is protective scientific jurisprudence that supports the assertion of causation based on criteria of “more likely than not”. P.33.”
And to add:
“Epidemiological data, the results of experiments on animals (not contradicted, at present, by other experiments of the same type), the duration and intensity of exposure … which are particularly important in view of the dose-response relationship established – at the scientific level – between exposure to mobile phone radiofrequencies and the risk of acoustic neuroma, as well as the absence of any other factor which could have caused the disease”.
All the scientific elements of the case were re-examined and re-analysed by two new experts appointed by the Court of Turin (Carolina Marino, Angelo D’Errico). The Court of Appeal fully accepted their conclusions and rejected INAIL’s* appeal, stating that CTU had provided:
“strong evidence to assert a causal role between the complainant’s occupational exposure, his exposure to radiation from mobile phones and the disease that occurred”.
This is the second Italian appeal judgment in favour of a worker after the Brescia judgment in 2010, which concluded with the confirmation of the Supreme Court in 2012, case of Marcolini v. INAIL. In this case, the Court of Bergamo had rejected the application in first instance.
The Romeo v. INAIL case is therefore historic. It is the first in world judicial history to have had two consecutive judgments in favour of the plaintiff. It is also historic because of the principles underlying this decision and particularly because it is written about the conflicts of interest of certain experts close to the mobile phone industry.
Indeed, the Tribunal recognizes that telephone industry-funded scientists, or members of the ICNIRP, are less reliable than independent scientists:
“Much of the scientific literature that excludes carcinogenicity from RF exposure, or at least argues that research to the contrary cannot be considered conclusive… is in a position of conflict of interest, which is not always asserted: see, in particular, on page 94 of the report, the Applicant’s defence (not contested by the other party) that the authors of the studies indicated by INAIL, who are mentioned by name, are members of ICNIRP and/or SCENIHR, which have received, directly or indirectly, funding from industry. P. 33.”
The Turin CTU states:
“It is considered that less weight should be given to studies published by authors who have not declared the existence of conflicts of interest. In this case, conflict of interest situations may arise in relation to the assessment of the effect of radio frequencies on health, for example :
1. cases where the author of the study advised the telephone industry or received funding for studies from the telephone industry
2. if the author himself is a member of the ICNIRP.”
For Dr. Marc Arazi, President of Phonegate Alert:
“Attorney Stefano Bertone’s determined fight to defend the victims of overexposure to our mobile phone waves and the consequences for their health is exemplary. He was one of the first lawyers to take the measure of the revelations linked to the Phonegate scandal. A year ago, together with his law firm and the Italian association APPEL, he and his firm condemned the Italian government to launch major information campaigns on the risks associated with the use of mobile phones. This new decision is all the more important and confirm the need for a moratorium on the deployment of 5G”.
*Istituto Nazionale per l’Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro
To learn more on the same subject:
Phonegate Alert invited to the International conference Stop 5G at the Italian Parliament
SUMMARY-of-the-Turin-Court-of-Appeal-9042019 – Radiation Research Trust
SOURCE: astronomersappeal.wordpress.com
This Appeal can be signed by:
For centuries the astronomical observations from the ground have led to exceptional progress in our scientific understanding of the Laws of Nature. Currently, the capability of astronomical instrumentation from the ground is endangered by the deployment of satellites fleets.
Through this international appeal and following the same concerns expressed by the International Astronomical Union, IAU [1] and other institutions, we raise a formal request for greater effective protection and safeguard for professional astronomical observations from the ground, guaranteeing the right to observe a sky free from unnecessary artificial polluting sources.
READ FULL APPEAL AND DETAILS ON HOW TO SIGN HERE
The Minister for Housing and Planning, Eoghan Murphy is proposing a new Bill which will essentially restrict citizens’ and environmental NGO’s ability to legally challenge planning applications and developments.
This Bill will have serious consequences for the fight against mobile phone masts and antennae, including 5G.
Closing date is 27th January 2020
Helpful templates available on Ireland for Safe Technology Website
More information:
Environmental groups outline shock at proposed planning Bill – https://environmentalpillar.ie
‘Draconian’ planning Bill would ‘set the clock back’ on access to justice – https://greennews.ie
Environmentalists say proposed Bill makes it harder to object to planning decisions – https://www.irishtimes.com
SOURCE: An Scéal 10th December 2019
Listen here : https://ansceal.ie/2019/12/10/5g-wifi-concerns-precautions/
https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12456
We investigate the relationship between cell phones and brain cancer using brain cancer death rates for 88 countries between 1990 and 2015 from the World Health Organization and country‐level mobile phone subscription rates from the World Bank. We estimate difference‐in‐difference models including country and year fixed effects and time‐varying country covariates. We find that mobile phone subscription rates are positively and statistically significantly associated with death rates from brain cancer 15–20 years later. In falsification tests, we find few positive associations between mobile phone subscription rates and deaths from rectal, pancreatic, stomach, breast or lung cancer or ischemic heart disease. Finally, differential effects models suggest that mobile phone subscription rates are associated with brain cancer deaths 15–19 years later relative to deaths from other causes. (JEL I15, O33)
Smartphones, tablets, smart watches, fitbits, drones, virtual reality headsets, wireless earphones, Airpods and wifi enabled toys and gadgets expose your child to harmful microwave radiation. Children are more vulnerable to adverse health effects as they absorb more radiation than adults.
Read More Here: Fact-Sheet-Compilation-Holiday-Alert.pdf
Prof. Olle Johansson – Adverse Health Effects of Artificial Electromagnetic Fields:
Prof. Tom Butler – What does Science say about Risks of Wireless technologies:
Electromagnetic Sense Ireland 